The differences between how the two directors make a film was very interesting. The first director used lots of post production and special effects to make something that was filmed on a very small scale with little equipment seem very dramatic. The second director filmed something over a huge length of time, 12 years. This was also very small budget, getting the bare minimum needed every year.
I found the first example really cool because there was really inventive visual effects used to make a great scene that feels very cinematic, despite it being made in such a small area. The green screen and post productions effects used in making Sin City was interesting to see, especially to see how dramatic effects can change a film.
Boyhood was interesting because it was made over a period spanning 12 years. That interested me because it meant the age change felt very natural. It was a really long coming of age film to shoot, but I think the extra time meant that the actors could grow up together and that made it feel more natural on screen as a result.
I found the first example really cool because there was really inventive visual effects used to make a great scene that feels very cinematic, despite it being made in such a small area. The green screen and post productions effects used in making Sin City was interesting to see, especially to see how dramatic effects can change a film.
Boyhood was interesting because it was made over a period spanning 12 years. That interested me because it meant the age change felt very natural. It was a really long coming of age film to shoot, but I think the extra time meant that the actors could grow up together and that made it feel more natural on screen as a result.
Comments
Post a Comment